'Extra Tax on Fast Food Essay\r'

'Nowadays stack always argon overweight or obese. A big agreement of this is un sanitary pabulum like a larger Mac, Hamburger etc. Too much of both of those evoke cause serious health problems which a lot of nation of the world today flummox from. The real problem is why ar people making these choices? It’s simple, rheumy sustenance is cheaper than healthy nourishment in many cases. Is it a adept idea to introduce a profuse feed assess, or do unhealthy food conserve to remain cheap and free of tautological measure?\r\nTo start things off, I leave behind refer to this unhealthy food as â€Å" luxuriant food”. mavin problem with fast foods is that they are low in satiation value. That is, people don’t bleed to feel as full when they corrode them, which can lead to overeating. Another problem is that unhealthy food tends to replace other, to a greater extent nutritious foods. When people are snacking on chips and cookies, they are usually not lode up on fruits and vegetables. Already you can split this is quite a problem, further it can be reduced to some degree if we raise the taxes on fast food.\r\nIf the taxes are increased so people will be opted to buy healthier foods such(prenominal) as vegetables or other nutrient abounding foods without added sugar or sodium. They will no longer be more expensive than the cheap, unhealthy, fast food. This in essence, will reduce the amount of unhealthy food that people will ingest. Another period of time is that the extra tax on fast food will saves lives. Heart disease is the second most coarse cause of death. Many lives could easily be saved. As well as saving lives, reducing corpulency will also improve the quality of life.\r\nThe contention against a extra tax on fast food is that those on low incomes are more likely to stimulate unhealthy foods, therefore this tax will increase variation. However, if a tax on fast food saves lives, we should not avoid implementin g it exactly because it is the poor who will mostly benefit. If we are really concerned about the impact on equality, the revenue from a fat tax can be targeted to the benefit of the poor. A increase in inequality need not occur from a fast food tax. Who is the government to tell people what to eat?\r\nIf we want to eat salty and fatty foods then let us eat this. The whole point is people are still free to consume as much salty and fatty foods as they like. All in all it can be said that it is an unfair tax because fast food is bad for people who suffer obesity, shouldn’t imply that everyone who enjoys the quick, cheap service fast food offers. tidy sum who are in a hurry or people short on cash whitethorn find fast food an ideal service, but if it is taxed due to obesity, then it will also continue people who aren’t obese.\r\n'