Crime And Punishment :: essays research papers

Raskolnikov, Whyd you do it?The character Raskolnikov in the wise Crime and Punishment is among unity of the most realistic and believable characters I have ever read about. He is also the most puzzling and distraught man I have been introduced to this entire year. Raskolnikov possesses the most change personality imaginable and this makes the reasoning foot his actions a mystery, especially in the case of the murder. Determining the rationale in killing the old pawnbroker is a complex process that necessitates deep thought from the reader. It is also a uncorrectable point to argue because Dostoevskys novel is so intensely expound that different readers can emphasize different aspects of the book in post to attempt to explain Raskolnikovs deeds.Guilt as well as intellectual reasoning prove to be the main motivating factors behind the crime of Raskolnikov. Throughout the novel his actions are usually a moderate of his striking intelligence or his tormenting conscience, or in the situation of the murder, both. Raskolnikovs idea to kill the old pawnbroker stems from a theory he was developing. It was apparent that during his studies at the university he was aquatinted with the popular philosophies of two German thinkers of the time. One of these philosophers is George Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, who had speculate a conception of an exceptional individual he called a pane. Hegels superman exists for solid purposes. He stands above and beyond the common man and works for the good of all men. The most controversial break open of this superman theory that Raskolnikov obviously adopts is the Machiavellian belief that the end justifies the mean. This subject matter that anything that could have a beneficial outcome for many should be considered careless(predicate) of the sacrifice of the few. If the intent is noble the method will be justified. fit in to Hegel, any damaging part of a community should be removed, and one tiny crime will be wiped clean by t he good deeds that occur because of it.Another prevalent German theorist was Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche who had a differing opinion of the superman. His idea was that the superman does not live for benefit of society, just instead for his own personal satisfaction. Nobility never prompts any of his aims. Nietzsche was a devout atheist who believed that either no God exists or that He was dead, so his superman is a man who, without fear of God, exerts his own desires completely.