3d Printing Technology Essay

Legitimate Concerns Facing 3D print TechnologyExecutive SummaryThis research journal condition discusses how 3D print applied science may effect federal firearms regulations. The concentrate on of the denomination is that, due to the emergence of 3D Printing engineering science, individuals, even nation without technical expertise, now have the ability to use the new technology to rise guns at home much more easily than they perpetu totallyy have before. This behavior might bring great harm to society. However, if a comprehensive prohibition on utilise 3D Printers to manufacture ain weapons were implemented, it might defy the 2008 District of Columbia v. Heller Supreme lawcourt decision. In fact, the modification magnitude popularity of 3D Printing means law bushelrs must m aged soon whether or not to cease 3D Printing of weapons. 3D Printing either should only be allowed to produce things that cannot be use as lethal weapons.Or, secondly, it can be use to produce a physical, working gun. The second option might achieve advances in 3D printing technology and promote the development of firearms design. However, developments in 3D Printing technology ar creating apprehensions that not only legitimate consumers unless too criminals are capable to print firearms at home. If the law doesnt allow individuals to use 3D printers to manufacturer personal weapons like handguns, it might be illegal according to the Second Amendment of the Constitution, a provision which protects the right of individuals to birth firearms under the law. Specifically, under the 2nd Amendment individuals may have the right to progress to their hold firearms for self-defense, and the right to the manufacture firearms technology and cloths. Analysis and CritiqueIn fact, 3D Printing technology is not brand new. This technology has been undergoing development for more than a decade. The reason it became more popular recently is because of decrease usage costs, so more and more individuals have the opportunity to own 3D Printers for personal use. In my analysis and critique of this journal nontextual mattericle, I leave alone focus on three different studys how well does it render information to the reader, how the product result evolve in the future, and what is my opinion of concern intimately 3D Printing technology relate to firearms production later reading this journal article.First of all, this article is well organized and shared out into four parts. The first part introduces what 3D Printing is, and how it is possible to produce firearms using the technology. The second part explains why the sale and production of firearms are limited under federal regulations, and provides an overall outlook of the firearm indus shew. character three includes explanations of how 3D printers may change firearms production. Finally, Part four describes the entire right to bear arms, and it also analyzes the extent to which Hellers mooring may lim it prohibitions on 3D Printing. Moreover, this article provides other full of life information to explain key points. It is a very valuable launch for a reader without a background in the subject who might not be very familiar with the IT industry or with the applicable legislation. Based on the info and supporting details provided by the author, readers will have a basic idea of the fundamental issues concerning the intersection of 3D Printing and weaponry. As a result, it relates the technology to big concerns rough common security, and the author gives great examples of the various legal arguments on the topic. Therefore, I recover this article is a valuable qualitative article that can overdraw peoples knowledge on the subject.Secondly, besides concerns about guns, in that respect are no other disadvantages to the improvement of 3D Printing, which will make the operating cost of the technology increasingly cheap. Jensen-Haxel explains how 3D Printing actually works in his articleThe process begins with a digital 3D model created using Computer Added Design (CAD) software. The software automatically slices the model into a stack of thin horizontal cross-sections about 0.1mm in height. The, 3D printer and then builds the physical model by depositing material layer by layer.At the same time, 3D Printers are getting smaller and smaller, which will make it easier for consumers to have their own machines at home. This changes the old production model. Nowadays, people are allowed to produce whatever they want using a 3D Printer, all they need are the required data and materials. In fact, because of the development of the Internet, it iseasier than ever for people to find these resources online. Evans states thatThe quickest counsel to get started with 3D printing is simply to find models online that others have already created and shared on the Internet. The online 3D printing community is growing all the time, so more and more things are being sha red all(prenominal) day.Therefore, the limitations of self-production have shifted from hardware difficulties to software or materials issues. The technology is becoming simpler to use, but it might harm light manufacturing industries because some designers may be able to use their own 3D Printers to produce a sample sooner of finding established producers that use traditional manufacturing methods. Because of these improvements, the potential for 3D Printing is bright, but the light manufacturing industry might be negatively moved(p) by it.Finally, the author argues that the rapid improvement of 3D Printing and the increasing convenience for individuals to produce things with it is both a major concern and a tremendous possibility. Should individuals receive the right to do whatever they want with 3D Printing technology, even the ability to print firearms? The topic of gun rubber eraser has become especially relevant since the school shooting in Newton, computed axial tomograp hy last year. More and more people are arguing about if the government should make some changes to firearms regulation.Jensen-Haxel wrote in his article that As the proponent of production passes from industry to consumer, many areas of the law may be caught unprepared. (P.448) Concerns about the rate of technological progress outpacing regulations are not limited to 3D Printing. Because of the relentless improvements to technology, more and more challenges will occur as regulators try to manage new technology. The fact is, in most cases, laws only change after a new problem occurs, which means that new products will often pull round in a legal gray area before rules can be changed. How the government deals with this issue might be a big concern in the following decades.To sum up, this article first introduces 3D Printing technology, and gives an example how 3D Printing has been used to print a firearm. As a result, the author relates this new technology to a regulatory concern. W ithin his argument, he provides lots of legal information, and then tries to point out a fact that some gray areas exist because regulation usually develops slower than a new technology can. patronise to this article, is seems like the future of 3D Printing technology in unreadable until the government resolves the legal issues concerning manufacturing weapons with this technology. ReferenceEvans, B. (2012). Practical 3D printers the science and art of 3D printing. New York Apress. Jensen-Haxel, Peter (2012). 3D Printers, Obsolete Firearm return Controls, and the Right to Build Self-Defense Weapons Under Heller. Golden Gate University police Review May2012, Vol. 42 Issue 3, p447-496, 50p