Brain-Behavior and Nature-Nurture: Two Interacting Scientific Debates E

Brain-Behavior and Nature-Nurture Two Interacting Scientific DebatesWhether there is more behind forgiving behavior than can be explained solely by uneasy phenomena has been the payoff of much time-worn scientific and philosophical debate. In regards to this question, two primary classes of substitute explanations come to mind the human soul and the milieu. The former of these involves a realizable internal, individualistic force guiding behavior beyond the guides provided by the drumhead many feel that the topic of the human soul is best left wing in the realm of the philosophical. Environ intellectual influences on behavior, however, atomic number 18 quite apt(p) to scientific investigations into the consciousness/behavior dichotomy. Whether and to what extent ones environment effects ones behavior, personality, even destiny is embodied by the widely publicized and highly politicized nature-nurture debate. Generally, those factors thought to come from nature ar those th at atomic number 18 inherited, and those thought to be nurture-bred are inculturated. It seems, then, that a discussion of neural control of behavior necessarily involves this nature-nurture question the interplay between inherited brain structure and inculturated experience offers insight into the roots of behavior. Vitalists and reductionists, empiricists and situationists, geneticists and sociologists all have something different to say about the degree to which the human genome specifies human traits. Many of these traits are behavioral, thus, these people also have much to say about the percentage of the brain in guiding behavior. It is estimated that sixty percent of human genes are dedicated to neurological development (5). This is an immense amount of genetic material, and, curiously du... ... still be subject to biased interpretations of which we are capable as human-mammals. Our concepts of reality will always be shaped by our genetically-inherited mental models (3). Subjecting myself to biased interpretations, though, I feel that an individual drawing breath distributively day in the context of many, nestled environments much akin to the Bronfenbrenner bionomical systems theory **, behaves ultimately because of the brain and the genes from which it originates.WWW Sources1) Comptons Encyclopediahttp//comptons2.aol.com/ encyclopedia/ARTICLES/03888_html2) The Eye of the Frog http//www.objana.com/frog/home.html3) Sociobiology page http//res3.geocities.com/Athens/Acropolis/3976/socio.html4) Of Mice and Men http//www.informinc.co.uk/LM/LM73/LM73_Futures.html5)Pro-nurture http//www.michiganinbrief.org/text/issues/issue-23.htm