Palm oil stalemate: who is responsible Essay

SummaryPalm anoint is a vegetation with various uses in human life (such as tooth paste, Moisturizer and biodiesel). Malaysia is one of the largest producers and exporters of palm oil.Gajah Berang oil Palm Estate is one of the largest multinational palm oil compounds whose managers offer a balance mingled with dexterity and engagementee satisfaction.The federation has multicultural employee since its scaters from Sri Lanka, Indonesia, India and Bangladesh.Melaka Palm Oil project presented one of the biggest ventures for the firm. To enhance the balance between qualification of the firms operations and employee satisfaction the participation employed Abdul Aziz as the farming manager. Abdul Aziz shared common mother tongue with pack of Malaysia thus reservation him to have a similar culture with the people of Malaysia.Hearing Abdul Aziz (Indonesian) was an value to the company sinceHis ability to control the operations of the company at bottom the portion since h e possessed the shared culture with the people of Malaysia.He heighten social responsibility by involving the people of the region to company soulfulnessal matters through hiring themAbdul Aziz utilize various leadership and communication skills to encourage employees to work effectively in the company.During the course of Abdul Aziz leadership, the workers went on strike asking for just water and tank covers. He wanted to settle the issue simply the Lee Peng who was his superior argued that this could compromise Abdul Aziz as a profession and as a result he looked for his replacement.1. Describe Malaysian cultural attributes and how they competency affect the operations of a multinational palm oil conglomerate doing business within Malaysia. Malaysia has diverse culture following different pagan groups. Some of the cultural attributes of the people include beliefs, language, politics, and religion. This attributes would affect the operation of the international palm oil po sitively or negatively depending on how it would accomplish this attributes.For Example, if the company focuses on satisfying all the cultural attributes of the people of Malaysia, then(prenominal) it will be in a good position to racket efficiency and wide market for its product. On the other hand, if the company does non satisfy the cultural attributes of the people, then it would expect low efficiency in its operations.2. What are some effective leadership and communication skills that lead to the evolution of a positive worker-manager relationship in international business? Aziz used various leadership and communication skills to enhance efficiency in the company A)He allowed the employees to take part in decision making process. This acted as a motivation to the employees thus helped to increase their productivity.B)He withal showed empathy to employees and shared much with them. He extended his gratitude to employees by auditory sense to their issues. C)He used his troubleshooting skills to solve problems within the company. D)He was open to foster proper communication with employees something that ensured clear communication of information within the company. E)He used his mother tongue language to persuade employees to love the company more and more.3. Would you describe the respective attitudes of Aziz, Krishnan, and Lee Peng as ethnocentric, polycentric, or Ptolemaic? What factors do you suspect of having influenced their respective attitudes? Aziz, Krishnan and Lee Peng can be tell to have polycentric attitude. This is because their decision to put Aziz on the Manager position was a focus to enhance openness towards the culture, opinions and ways of life to the people of Malaysia. Aziz was the briny player in ensuring that the employees of the Multinational palm oil felt comprehended and recognized through their culture. Generally, this people ensured that the independence of the culture of the people of Malaysia was esteem and appre ciated. However, the attitude of Lee Peng can be said to be ethnocentric. This is because he wanted the issue to be solved professionally without focusing on the culture of the people.4. Was Lee Peng correct in assessing Aziz s polemic actions in the work stalemate? Should a palm oil conglomerate employ someone whose main function is that of liaison between its corporate culture and the culture of its military country? If so, was Aziz the right person for the job in the detailed scenario? Lee peng was not correct in assessing Azizs controversial actions. This is because Azizs aim was to balance the companys operation efficiency with employee satisfaction. However, Lee thought that Aziz would be compromised professionally by the employees for being so close to them. To some extend this could take place but in this situation such relation was very helpful for the company.Palm Oil conglomerate should not employ a person based on the function of liaison between corporate culture a nd the culture of the host county. However, It should focus on employing someone who is multicultural. This is because culture plays an important role to people of different countries. In this case, such employment was very vital since Aziz was multicultural and could listen to the needs and demands of the people of Malaysia as compared to his collogues (counterparts). In my opinion, Aziz was the right person for the job because he was multicultural and was professionally competent (MBA and he also worked in a small palm project in Indonesia). These two factors are very vital for a company to run smoothly. With these qualities he was able to control and satisfy the employees of the company. Professionally, he could lead employees to enhance efficiency in their work. On the other hand, he could motivate the employees by listening to their problems and allowing them to contribute towards the company operations.